Genesis 13: Abraham leaves Egypt to return to Canaan. In this chapter Lot and Abraham split up because there was not enough land for their animals and other things. There was mention to Zoar, Sodom, and Gomorrah for the first time. Iām really trying to focus on the story of Abraham so I can better understand it. I hear a lot about Abraham, but I honestly donāt know a lot about him.
7/6 Reading (Genesis 10-12; Luke 4)
Genesis 10: Chapter is all about Noahās descendants and where they lived. His sonās and their descendants moved to different parts of the Middle East. Based on whatās written here, it seems like they each had their own language. The descriptions of each son ends with āThese are the descendants of Japheth in their lands, with their own language, by their families, in their nationsā (10.5). 10.20 is similar except it is about Ham. 10.31 is about Shem. These verses definitely make it sound like each group has their own language. More on this in the next chapter.
7/5 Reading (Genesis 7-9; Luke 3)
Genesis 7: Chapter is about the Great Flood. Iām still stuck on a thought from yesterday. HOW did everyone get to be so evil except for Noah and his family? Also, first God tells Noah āTake with you seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and its mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and its mate; and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive on the face of all the earthā (7.2-3). Later in the chapter I read this: āthey and every wild animal of every kind, and all domestic animals of every kind, and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, and every bird of every kindāevery bird, every winged creatureā (7.14). I may be reading this wrong or being too critical, but from what I remember, Noah took two of every kind of species. That seems to align with what is said in verse 14, but not what is said in verses 2-3. From the notes this was done because of the later sacrifices. I was happy to see this statement in the notes section: āThough many world traditions speak of floods, there is no geological evidence of a global flood of the sort described hereā (p. 20-21).
7/4 Reading (Genesis 4-6; Luke 2)
Genesis 4: Story of Cain and Abel. Iāve been reading a really fun series called the Belial Stone and there is a lot of references to Genesis. There are several characters from Genesis in the series. Pretty fascinating read that I recommend to others. I didnāt realize that Adam and Eve had a third son, Seth. Again this shows my lack of knowledge of the Bible. One thing I am curious about is why was God pleased with Abel but not Cain (4.4-5). The notes indicate this was not explained. Another question, if Cain and Abel were the first offspring, then who was Cain afraid of in 4.14 (Today you have driven me away from the soil, and I shall be hidden from your face; I shall be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth, and anyone who meets me may kill me.ā)? Iām assuming that he would be afraid of his ancestors here unless there are other people around by this time. However, there must have been another ancestral line somewhere considering he married someone.
7/3 Reading (Genesis 1-3; Luke 1)
First day reading the Bible. I will find it really challenging to NOT read all of the footnotes as well as the introduction to each book. But reading the introduction will be really helpful for this endeavor.
Intro to Genesis: So, here are my thoughts on the introduction to Genesis. First, I have heard and read in several places that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all believe in the same God. It was good to see in the intro that all three ālay claim to the characters and stories of Genesis, each with their distinct understanding of the meaning of this important book of beginningsā (p. 7). Pretty cool stuff. I had no idea that the authorship of the Pentateuch wasnāt attributed to Moses until after his lifetime. That’s pretty interesting. Fascinating reading about when Genesis was written on pages 7-8. Iāve heard and read many times that Moses is the author of the first five books. So this kinda surprised me: āNevertheless, we do know that the book was written over centuries by multiple authors, and we have a more specific and assured picture of the final stages of its compositionā (p. 8). This makes me wonder why is it that many people argue that Moses was the author. Why is this so important?